 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
: J. v6 t! ~( `/ \( ]1 B
! t1 q8 c n- L" ~% ?& |$ L诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
0 F: o9 ]6 k6 _阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。. \7 h$ c( i" ?+ N
3 ^3 M. V" D: j$ G2 A. P4 A
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
* q' ^9 Z1 x, z+ d& [) g; ?0 E; B
, C k9 q6 r1 C) E$ lBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
7 a8 y0 |; p) _0 K3 n! P$ A9 |- h3 {/ p& y
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
2 o6 b4 s3 U' p1 C( b5 z. ?
2 ?+ V1 [- C) Z; c- H) W" FThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
& A8 J* L2 j- H- s
, ]3 v# i2 d. W( v. ]! R+ xHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.+ h Y( @! a) w4 O% @# `6 U
5 W7 w* t. ?, u! a" O/ I" m" e
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
3 U4 n' Z4 D+ o4 a% D9 n
" d+ t/ p# g& T$ I: {4 GActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.$ E' Z; `% O3 j; M
8 z) z3 P( V1 g5 c) w& N) V- v
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.9 @+ ?! U9 D1 j0 J) D
/ q9 o9 x6 r* \" N: a- |
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
( L9 q! ]& w1 o0 _5 K5 T: ?8 p, T5 o4 C* V' z- g/ M. D* E
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”4 \0 {1 _5 @% k# C
0 e: y4 }7 H% Z1 C" T' j
5 \7 J" U2 w4 x" V6 V4 e- F7 e. e: H4 t. }
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.% n; e& Y9 ^; _8 ^, r
4 h! j) P# ]2 X& x. y# J
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.: M6 O9 c- q; I# A
! J6 @1 \0 ^/ O; z# M2 z0 DNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.1 j2 v) O# `5 ]. A% }; K1 M4 Q, J! T
; d! L0 v; c+ R. y' m# s, C3 tGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
/ W8 O# z; M$ a* O) ^ Z7 ~( g$ @
8 K% w3 u1 @/ D3 n3 l% XBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
# H6 X9 s7 z# z1 {2 E! s$ P; ~8 [' B
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.. J7 E1 k6 }5 u. X( p# A
- ?) [2 ]- P9 G0 P
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
! _4 L* R0 j+ v' Q/ r5 v" w* f1 P) u. W* h. R% e( ~
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
3 j! M% M5 w- `, J& b3 m$ ?+ [; w5 c- E6 t1 m, ]" H% a
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.5 D2 l5 k2 u: I$ y+ u9 u( z
3 V; v8 M/ K- A) t" N5 b0 r6 \“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”, x1 G" d+ p/ Q) K% U$ b: e, Y" ?
. q. p1 i" `% C5 T5 o! N |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 & O* F5 B8 R0 }- P f; T T+ O
