global warming

竹帘儿

原帖由 OliveOil 于 2008-1-17 17:37 发表

. u+ y2 h( @1 x8 ~  ~* YDid you just feel attack needed only because I replied to 34 and APPEARED to oppose what she believs?

no. I wanted to reply to your posts on floor 8 and 9, just hadn't got time to do so before 34 replied to you. We didnt "team up to beat you up'', she happend to have the same opioions as mine, can say that you were a bit too sensitive on this subject matter?
( o5 _2 ^+ Q& _
! B8 `; C5 d" z3 b* dGet back to your question, I did read through you posts, but now I am quite confused of what you really wanted to say. Cuz on floor 8,9, you didnt sound ''doubt'' the relevance between human activities and global warming, but rather denied it, to make it worse, you said people are fooled by this theory and gave us a link claiming that this is the true facts and real science. But, I just learnt from your latest post that all what you are against is what Gore says . Well, I never heard any speeches given by Gore, neither did I watch his famous movie, I have my own sources of information and take accordingly actions as per what I learn. For me, consuming less meat is not only for global warming, but just another action to reduce my ecological footprint, 250km worth of gas per kilo, that's something...
9 _. S* p8 Q% X8 a
I guess we should be good here.  We can continue to criticize Gore or propose some other ecological ideas.

贾星星

原帖由 三思 于 2008-1-17 21:08 发表
5 A2 y# D. ]: t8 {9 K
! r9 ^' P, i3 ?! O  d4 @! tlook it up before bring it up

' ^: x8 y: u, O1 n0 w5 ]
* k2 `% B' _2 O6 N& d
You may want to say " right on !",  " good point!" or " you hit the point. "

三思

原帖由 luckibird2 于 2008-1-18 13:00 发表

# S. o: [+ e" A- D1 c* |

You may want to say " right on !",  " good point!" or " you hit the point. "

' t- |8 u0 ?7 Z. u5 t
) D8 _1 e# I+ f; HVery well said! but you didn't look "well said" up, did you?

贾星星

原帖由 三思 于 2008-1-20 09:55 发表

$ L$ G# b$ D& K$ }
. s  N3 r7 v  `+ a) Z3 PVery well said! but you didn't look "well said" up, did you?

6 B5 X$ ~0 v1 T. F- E0 e0 }) Pyou are right. last week I asked my co-worker (canadian), "well said" is ok
) z9 D& o' h% @9 q% T; {( Ha better one might be " well spoken" anyway you are right

竹帘儿

原帖由 luckibird2 于 2008-1-20 11:09 发表
! T) g# _' u, L  M; _8 g


) c( M/ _; F- e  a. Uyou are right. last week I asked my co-worker (canadian), "well said" is ok
a better one might be " well spoken" anyway you are right

7 C# X! `" Z' `( [
although they have some amount of overlap in terms of meaning, I think well said is more used as a comment, while well spoken is more of an adjective (a characristic of an individual for instance).

三思

原帖由 竹帘儿 于 2008-1-20 22:17 发表


although they have some amount of overlap in terms of meaning, I think well said is more used as a comment, while well spoken is more of an adjective (a characristic of an individual for instance) ...

/ F4 p% J7 l* b1 h, P6 Bright, more specifically, well said is praising the content of the speech, while well spoken is praising the manner of the speechperson. So my using well said is more appropriate in this case.
& _+ ]# @6 j+ Y
Little birdie, this is for your lesson.

贾星星

I have carefully thought about the context again. Now I realized that here "well said" fit the context best. "good point"  may be good, but it usually refers to a good conclusion rather than a whole statement.
& _5 C1 N4 i9 v  |4 |: O9 W"You hit the point" may imply that the speaker already knew quite well about this matter.
! D6 {1 K9 H  I% t. e) X9 SSame with "right on" , and it is more frequently encountered on informal occasions.


5 g7 y$ H0 I9 L0 t2 VAny more comments? Thanks.

三思

原帖由 luckibird2 于 2008-1-22 12:32 发表
5 I, r/ `8 e) ]8 YI have carefully thought about the context again. Now I realized that here "well said" fit the context best. "good point"  may be good, but it usually refers to a good conclusion rather than a whole s ...

$ Y4 |# O2 ^1 n' k' L4 j' `没有你说得那么复杂，从字面上就可以看出来
, v# @2 U9 @5 w5 hwell said,说得好 (指内容）
1 @( b! Z; A- z8 g0 nwell spoken 讲的好（指manner)
0 |4 {; x( V9 n  u" G% i1 Ugood point: 这个观点很好
you hit the point: 你说到点子上了
right on: 实际上是“right on the point", 也是说到点子上了

竹帘儿

原帖由 luckibird2 于 2008-1-22 12:32 发表
* N9 B# ?2 I6 s/ z9 \I have carefully thought about the context again. Now I realized that here "well said" fit the context best. "good point"  may be good, but it usually refers to a good conclusion rather than a whole s ...

% x6 E! v% D) U9 v
very well said! no more comment.

贾星星

原帖由 竹帘儿 于 2008-1-22 13:35 发表
2 w4 R! N# y! L

: A- ^% N1 k& F0 Y( O very well said! no more comment.

4 q- k* ?# [$ Z# r6 T& z

  Y1 y' W9 B- ^# }7 }5 u, v% N

贾星星

原帖由 三思 于 2008-1-22 13:17 发表

没有你说得那么复杂，从字面上就可以看出来
) \& T  L! p4 i$ d* Swell said,说得好 (指内容）
9 Y- g! R9 u  f5 f" awell spoken 讲的好（指manner)
6 ~! G7 ~& I+ q7 v6 h; B! x* h3 W. b& ?good point: 这个观点很好
you hit the point: 你说到点子上了
$ t6 d- y! L* I8 {right on: 实际上是“right on the poi ...

. A" L# n: z$ t; s9 K6 h5 p1 e
9 e) t# {) m1 z% f+ LThanks.

三思

原帖由 luckibird2 于 2008-1-22 16:34 发表

. r( R# A$ O% Z6 n4 T6 \2 [, W( ?3 [
+ R; M8 i- \7 @/ J6 C% F
Thanks.

you bet