 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
9 A+ ^4 U- A& U7 b$ M' F3 q. F! b: O; g
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。- d8 ?1 V W1 _0 t1 Z* t
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
1 [5 _$ \; ?! c5 u) T4 D% O/ r8 l% L9 R! I* r: F, {$ I
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
4 n$ C& Y7 F% B# [$ W; t- _
& R' m u: z7 P( JBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse1 M: K' t8 W) w" z. c& U
$ x9 q/ y9 k+ L4 c7 C- g
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.7 A/ S6 }/ k+ y! e. S, V
6 y8 j) a' x' R# u+ ^% F9 H: E
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.% n0 K- L. u* Q/ r% _$ Z
3 T1 D( x9 |. u* f# `
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.# Y) t: ?" M% l& y! D
- D5 D3 Q5 F) P8 e; L. S' W7 p" pAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
; j, g* X: s! H. ~$ R9 N6 D+ D! R& D: y+ }
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
, @: h" A0 Z7 l8 h* e/ \9 G! [! k2 i# I$ U
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.9 @& I4 i0 `8 o3 T6 ?! ?% \
$ n+ }+ ~) O8 o/ F- N“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”0 v# h5 w3 }% D. R7 C! ~/ ~
/ M, l% f3 x# ?0 g+ lPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
2 b& q, |( w4 V+ J; [; H# i8 A3 z: n u9 P
2 o, N7 K3 ^: L4 d, Q
! O0 S) j; w' }- x1 t: m) J1 VThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
$ P3 ~% @; K c3 z6 Q" D3 `- `: E6 l. k: h6 l- a) {% ^& N4 h$ ?8 }! O
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction." j; c8 [5 ]9 c- F/ i; |, |
! D& R% [/ t: Z& v% [1 m) f( [1 kNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
$ K3 g/ R. m+ {# I. @% A; u7 n: ]% d+ P- F
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
1 r# H8 r0 K, \" I6 T
- U2 q( j7 I8 Z+ g) [. f NBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
2 r1 T3 A$ Z+ a5 d2 }. l4 C# Y- @3 J* V; E
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
/ s4 }. V/ N# J, ]" ` Y% ^; \) B5 J% U$ j
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy./ f2 Z7 v# r: x- E
# A0 A7 I0 T- L& J1 `( [5 G
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
1 i. n, P1 x! i! S, h5 E2 \- G
% W. z Y+ A8 }5 Y D“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.0 |: G; Q) z$ S* g7 J6 z
i0 q$ Z1 Y3 x
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
: ^! S( O( g2 Z( }4 C V- ^
- k4 `- h7 z8 M, R8 | |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 9 P# U4 j7 f1 E+ t( _6 L) N$ y/ Z1 G
